John Nagy wrote:
Curious about the views versus whatever... the count clearly does not increment by repeated entries by the same viewers, so - huh?
John Nagy wrote: »
You suggest AMX is to blame for a high price. I recall a web page unintentionally leftover from before the AMX deal, found by a poster here... that had $799 as the iPhone dealer price (the iPad wasn't even out yet). Seems it has gone down twice now.
You suggest that because they are "the same" the iPad version shouldn't cost more. I suggest that the the iPhone version has been downpriced because of its relative lesser utility. Adjusting prices for market reasons is done every day. Remember Pentiums and Celerons? The Celerons were pentiums that had the coprocessor deliberately burned out or disconnected so they could sell them cheaper. So they were MORE WORK and the SAME INSIDE as a Pentium that you had to pay more to get. Sold by VALUE, not by weight...
Just suggesting that there's more ways to look at this than you suggest.