NXC-MPE or newer Netlinx master?
bob
Posts: 296
in AMX Hardware
Hi there,
would you recommend getting the NXC-MPE master to replace an Axcent3 based master or is the NXC-MPE not as good as newer Netlinx masters? I am not necessarily into Jave and money is an issue. The system consist of a couple of Axcess cardframes and VPN-CP panels. I may add an AXB-SPE to drive Axlink busses though.
Can someone with experience compare the NXC-MPE to say NXC-ME260?
Thanks,
Bob.
would you recommend getting the NXC-MPE master to replace an Axcent3 based master or is the NXC-MPE not as good as newer Netlinx masters? I am not necessarily into Jave and money is an issue. The system consist of a couple of Axcess cardframes and VPN-CP panels. I may add an AXB-SPE to drive Axlink busses though.
Can someone with experience compare the NXC-MPE to say NXC-ME260?
Thanks,
Bob.
0
Comments
Thanks,
Bob
The NXC-MPE is a great tool for learning how to write NetLinx code. But if you ever plan to use (let alone write) anything in java, you'll need an NI-series or ME260 master.
Going forward, AMX is writing modules (almost?) exclusively in java. As time goes on, more and more independent programmers will likely follow suit. You will never be able to use these modules.
So, if you can live with where the MPE firmware is frozen (2.31.137 or earlier) and without any modules, the master itself is fine.
-
On the other hand, if you don't need all those buffered AXlink ports of the SPE, you might want to find out what you can get an NI-700 for and compare all your options for the present and the future.
-Mark
I just converted 20 Axcent III's over to slaves with NI-700's as master. It took about 20 minutes to modify the my old code and another 15 minutes to add the extra axlink, convert the Axcent III to slave and get the system all up. Another bonus is the speed of the NI-700 is more than the NXC-MPE.
Just to confirm, they both can run Java modules? I can remember reading somerwhere that there is a special ME260/64 version of the ME260 only which could do Java because of the larger memory. Can the memory card of the ME260 be upgraded and is it standard CF?
PS:
Anyone by any chance has an used ME260 for sale, only the processor card maybe left from an upgrade?
Thanks,
Bob.
Looking at:
http://www.amx.com/product-details.asp?lin=84&pf=1&pid=614
I have found an "EXM-64MB NetLinx 64MB Memory Upgrade for NXC-ME260" which seems to be an official version of an upgrade to the 260?!
Thanks,
Bob
Your options are an NI-anything or an ME260/64. ME260 is not going to work.
The ME260/64 is a different model, not just a 260 with extra memory. However, I'll allow there is a possiblity I am mis-informed.
No. There is not an upgrade option for the flash memory of the NI-700. If you need more memory, you need to look at an NI-X000 or the new NI-X100 series. They have compact flash modules and can be expanded to higher memory capacities.
As far as the question of an ME260 not being able to run Duet, it cannot. The ME260/64 can, but the ME260 cannot. This is because Duet requires more volatile RAM than is available on the ME260 (it has 16MB of volatile RAM). The ME260/64 has 64MB of volatile RAM. The NI series has 32MB of volatile RAM.
The size of the flash card is not the restricting value for whether a unit can run Duet.
I interpret this as 16MB CF card onboard which maybe swaped out to larger CF and CFII cards, even 1GB microdrive.
??
The 16MB SDRAM in that statement is the volatile RAM that is insufficient for Duet. SDRAM is not increased by the introduction of a larger CF.
The CF provides the disk for the file system, which stores firmware files, NetLinx program files, Web Pages, and user file access via NetLinx FILE_* commands, Duet Java file IO, and FTP.