Home AMX User Forum AMX General Discussion

What code doesn't do

Found this link, thought you might enjoy it.

http://www.drivl.com/posts/view/494

Joe

Comments

  • I've added drivl.com to my favorites list.
  • GSLogicGSLogic Posts: 562
    Great post!
    I always wondered why Halle Barry doesn't walk through the door or my code doesn't spin around like in the movie Swordfish.
  • ... but best code ever runned over screens is still the Matrix code.... :-)

    Remember Jurrasic Park when that girl hacks a Unix system!?!??!
    But best at this point was the German synchronization - "Unix" was not spoken English but plain German....
  • mpullinmpullin Posts: 949
    lol, that's great.
  • You know how programmers hunt elephants?
    CLIPPER programmers don't actually hunt elephants, they just buy libraries of elephant parts and then spend years trying to integrate them.

    DBASE programmers only hunt elephants at night when no one will notice that they are still using crossbows.

    FOXPRO programmers switch to newer and better rifles every few days which causes them to spend more time learning new shooting techniques than actually hunting.

    C programmers refuse to buy rifles off the shelf, preferring to take steel rods and a mobile machine shop to Africa intending to build the perfect rifle for the job from scratch.

    PARADOX programmers go to Africa with copies of Hollywood movie scripts about elephant hunting, the re-enactment of which they believe will help them catch an elephant.

    ACCESS programmers zero right in on an elephant right away, even with no prior experience in elephant hunting, and then, impeccably dressed and fully looking the part, get the elephant in their beuatifully-mounted scopes, and then realize that other than missing a trigger, they are 99.9% 'there'.

    RBASE programmers are rarer than elephants. In fact, when an elephant sees an RBASE programmer he considers it a luck day.

    VISUAL ACCESS programmers point at their bullets, point at their rifles, then point at the elephant. This amuses the elephants, who run away. They are unable to persue the elephant because their jeeps are undriveable having steering wheels, yokes, joy sticks and rudders, due to their love of multiple controls.

    ADA, APL, and FORTRAN programmers are just as fictional as Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy.

    COBOL programmers have too much empathy to hunt another near-extinct species

    Any ideas how AXcess, NetLinx and Duet Programmers hunt elephants? :D
  • LMAO, oh how true. Like how in the movie terminator and how only bio-forms could be time-shifted. The cyborg could still make it because he was wrapped with real? flesh but not any of his fancy guns. Ever wonder why not implant the gun inside of him and he could pull it out later...hmmmm.
  • JeffJeff Posts: 374
    From the comments:
    http://nand.net/~demaria/hollywood.txt

    My favorite bit from that is another Jurassic Park reference.

    A custom system with millions of lines of code
    controlling a multimillion dollar theme park can be operated by a 13 year
    old who has seen a Unix system before. Seeing an operating system means you
    know how to run any application on that system, even custom apps.
    Note: What OS was it really running?
    (1) "These are super computers". A CrayOS?
    (2) "Quicktime movie, Apple logo, trash can." MacOS?
    (3) "Reboot. System ready. C:\" DOS?
    (4) "Hey, this is Unix. I know this" Unix?
    The computers in Jurassic Park were Cray supercomputers running the MacOS
    as a graphical shell of DOS all layered on top of a Unix base.
  • UltraLOL....
    Jeff wrote:
    From the comments:
    http://nand.net/~demaria/hollywood.txt

    My favorite bit from that is another Jurassic Park reference.

    ....

    The computers in Jurassic Park were Cray supercomputers running the MacOS
    as a graphical shell of DOS all layered on top of a Unix base.
  • Now all we have to do is tell the customer that just because you saw it in a movie doesn't mean it can be done in RL :(
  • Joe HebertJoe Hebert Posts: 2,159
    Any ideas how AXcess, NetLinx and Duet Programmers hunt elephants :D
    NETLINX programmers first decide the maximum number of elephants they’ll ever want to hunt and then hunt virtual elephants instead.

    DUET programmers don’t hunt elephants, they discover them.
  • DarksideDarkside Posts: 345
    If Operating Systems were beers

    Whilst this is a little bit dated now, I think it's still a good read..

    :-)



    If Operating Systems were beers

    DOS Beer
    Requires you to use your own can opener, and requires you to read the
    directions carefully before opening the can. Originally came only in
    an 8-oz. can, but now comes in a 16-oz. can. However, the can is
    divided into 8 compartments of 2 oz. each, which have to be accessed
    separately. Soon to be discontinued, although a lot of people are
    going to keep on drinking it after its no longer available.

    OS/2 Beer
    Comes in a 32-oz. can. Allows you to drink several DOS Beers
    simultaneously. Also allows you to drink Windows 3.1 Beer
    simultaneously, though somewhat more slowly. Advertises that its cans
    wont explode when you open them, even after shaking. You never really
    see anyone drinking OS/2 Beer, but the manufacturer (International
    Beer Merchants) claims that 9 million six-packs have been sold.

    UNIX Beer
    Comes in several different brands, in cans ranging from 8 oz. to 64
    oz. Drinkers of UNIX Beer display fierce brand loyalty, even though
    they claim that all the different brands taste almost identical.
    Sometimes the pop-top breaks off when you try to open them, so you
    have to have a can opener around for those occasions. If you use the
    can opener, you'll need a complete set of instructions or a friend who
    has been drinking UNIX Beer for several years.

    Mac Beer
    At first came only in a 16-oz. can, but now comes in a 32-oz. can.
    Considered by many to be a light beer. All the cans look identical.

    When you take one from the refrigerator, it opens itself. The
    ingredients list is not on the can. If you call to ask about the
    ingredients, you are told that you don't need to know. A notice
    on the side reminds you to drag your empties to the trash can.

    Windows NT Beer
    Comes in 32-oz. cans, but you can only buy it by the truckload. This
    causes most people to have to go out and buy bigger refrigerators. The
    can looks just like Windows 3.1 Beers, but the company promises to
    change the can to look like Windows 95 Beers. Touted as an
    industrial strength beer, and suggested for use only in bars.

    AmigaDOS Beer
    The company has gone out of business, but their recipe has been picked
    up by some weird German company, so now this beer will be an import.
    AmigaDOS Beer never really sold very well because the original
    manufacturer didn't understand marketing. Like UNIX Beer fans,
    AmigaDOS drinkers are an extremely loyal and loud group. It originally
    came in a 16-oz. can, but now comes in 32-oz. cans too. When this can
    was originally introduced, it appeared flashy and colourful, but the
    design hasn't changed much over the years and now appears dated.
    Critics of this beer claim it is only meant for watching TV anyway.

    Windows 3.1 Beer
    The worlds most popular beer. Comes in a 16-oz. can that looks a lot
    like Mac Beers. Requires that you already own a DOS Beer. Claims that
    it allows you to drink several DOS Beers simultaneously, but in
    reality you can only drink a few of them, very slowly, especially if
    you are drinking the Windows Beer at the same time. Sometimes, for no
    apparent reason, a can of Windows Beer will explode when you open it.

    Windows 95 Beer
    People who have taste-tested it claim its wonderful. The can looks a
    lot like Mac Beers, but tastes more like Windows 3.1 Beer. It comes
    in 32-oz. cans, but when you look inside the cans only have 16 oz. of
    beer in them. Most people will probably keep drinking Windows 3.1
    until their friends try Windows 95 Beer and say they like it. Close
    inspection of the ingredients list reveals that Windows 95 Beer
    contains some of the ingredients in Windows 3.1 Beer, even though the
    manufacturer claims that this is an entirely new brew.

    VMS Beer
    Requires minimal user interaction, except for popping the top and
    sipping. However, cans have been known on occasion to explode, or
    contain extremely un-beer-like contents. Best drunk in high-pressure
    development environments. When you call the manufacturer for the list
    of ingredients, you're told that its proprietary and referred to an
    unknown listing in the manuals published by the FDA. Rumour is that
    this was once listed in the Physicians Desk Reference as
    tranquilizer, but no one can claim to have actually seen it.
  • Joe Hebert wrote:
    NETLINX programmers first decide the maximum number of elephants they?ll ever want to hunt and then hunt virtual elephants instead.

    DUET programmers don?t hunt elephants, they discover them.

    That's it!!!!! :)
Sign In or Register to comment.