Home› AMX User Forum› AMX Design Tools

latest release of TPDesign 4

informelinformel Posts: 66
in AMX Design Tools
I did not take any course last year and lost my certification.

Is it possible that the version available for ACE and others are different?

Latest version available for TPD4 is 2.11

but I have a manual that is for version 2.5 and I beleive the lastest version is 2.9

Reason I am asking is that if I want to modify the automatically generated touch panel .TP4 file I need TPDesign4 2.6 or higher.

Comments

  • ericmedleyericmedley Posts: 4,177
    informel wrote: »
    I did not take any course last year and lost my certification.

    Is it possible that the version available for ACE and others are different?

    Latest version available for TPD4 is 2.11

    but I have a manual that is for version 2.5 and I beleive the lastest version is 2.9

    Reason I am asking is that if I want to modify the automatically generated touch panel .TP4 file I need TPDesign4 2.6 or higher.
    I have 2.11.619
    That's what's on the website as far as I can tell.
  • informelinformel Posts: 66
    TPD4 version

    Eric
    if you follow this link http://www.amx.com/va/faq.asp#SystemDiagrams

    you will see the following:
    How do I add custom touch panel buttons?
    You cannot add custom touch panel buttons. However, you can modify the automatically generated touch panel .TP4 file using TPDesign4 2.6 or higher.

    Yves Laurin
    Les Systemes Umad
    ylaurin@umad.ca
  • Joe HebertJoe Hebert Posts: 2,159
    2 dot 11 is higher than 2 dot 6.
  • Joe HebertJoe Hebert Posts: 2,159
    informel wrote: »
    Is it possible that the version available for ACE and others are different?
    That would stir more controversy than the current Late Night wars at NBC.
  • HedbergHedberg Posts: 671
    Joe Hebert wrote: »
    2 dot 11 is higher than 2 dot 6.

    Oh.

    Never mind.
  • informelinformel Posts: 66
    Dah,,,,,
    Joe Hebert wrote: »
    2 dot 11 is higher than 2 dot 6.

    OK, I feel very stupid this morning.
    In my head I was seeing 2.06 (I am use to double didit verdion number).

    Thanks, I will hide in a corner for a while
  • ericmedleyericmedley Posts: 4,177
    informel wrote: »
    OK, I feel very stupid this morning.
    In my head I was seeing 2.06 (I am use to double didit verdion number).

    Thanks, I will hide in a corner for a while

    meh...

    don't sweat it. We all have our senior moments, even when we're young.
    :D
  • Jorde_VJorde_V Posts: 393
    informel wrote: »
    OK, I feel very stupid this morning.
    In my head I was seeing 2.06 (I am use to double didit verdion number).

    Thanks, I will hide in a corner for a while

    If you were seeing 2.06 in your head then it would be logical that you thought 2.11 > 2.06..

    But I reckon you were reading it as 2.60 rather than 2.06 ;)
  • Joe HebertJoe Hebert Posts: 2,159
    Nerieru wrote: »
    If you were seeing 2.06 in your head then it would be logical that you thought 2.11 > 2.06..
    Putting my mind reader cap on, I don?t think he thought that because if he did then the original question wouldn?t have been posted to begin with.
    Nerieru wrote: »
    But I reckon you were reading it as 2.60 rather than 2.06 ;)
    It shouldn?t be read as a decimal point either way.
    It?s not point 11 or point 6 or point 06, it?s just 11 and 6.
    The dot is there as a separator between major and minor revision.

    How?s that for beating the crap out of a dead horse? :)
Sign In or Register to comment.