control port interface
yangoua
Posts: 23
in AMX Hardware
Hi to all, please tell me, what choice to make between controlling device via serial port RS232 or control it via ethernet cable RJ45, i want to control Codec Polycom HDX9000 i have the two possibility what choice is efficient? please tell me with the reason. thank
0
Comments
That said i don't actually recall any issues with ip connected devices due to network failures and if you do have a network failure your TPs aren't working either so who would notice the dev is down too.
LAN pros:
Location/Geography is not an issue.
Cheaper
Serial pros:
Constant connection that never drops out.
A change of router config, IP address, Firewall policy, faulty switch etc doesn't affect control.
You are not subject to the local IT policies.
simpler to program & debug
less points of failure (no additional devices between controller and device)
ip pros:
cheaper
faster (only relevant with really chatty devices)
simpler termination (only one way to terminate cabling)
I usually use ip control for vtc endpoints since if they're disconnected from the network they're fairly useless anyway, they can pass a lot of information back & forth esp. if you're using the phone book, and it saves a serial port for other things. Also, since I use the available duet modules for both Polycom and Cisco endpoints the simpler programming for serial isn't really a factor.
-Ryan
Also, if you are going to control it over IP, use port 24, it's less "spammy" than port 23
The only "problem" I have with RS232, is that it is slower than IP. For instance, if you are asking for the contents of the addressbook.
Also, the HDX9000 has to possibility to use the RS232 port on the back for AMX control, so I would use it