Home› AMX User Forum› NetLinx Studio

<> Not Equal To != ?

2»

Comments

  • HARMAN_guy.minerviniHARMAN_guy.minervini Posts: 48
    Adjunct Committee to Stamp Out and Abolish Redundancy
    rynando wrote: »
    Ya but for me the readability is improved by having the != in there.

    It is more readable, but it runs just a hair slower...but that's not a big deal unless you run it 50,000 times in FOR loop.
  • AMXJeffAMXJeff Posts: 450
    Hi Guy!!!!!
  • Pep_SDPep_SD Posts: 106
    I too got burnt once using != intead of <>.
    it was so painfull that I completely stopped using != for 'not equal to'.

    It was when I started AMX a few years back and can't remember the case...
  • DHawthorneDHawthorne Posts: 4,584
    Pep_SD wrote: »
    I too got burnt once using != intead of <>.
    it was so painfull that I completely stopped using != for 'not equal to'.

    It was when I started AMX a few years back and can't remember the case...

    I had the same experience, and the same lack of memory what the circumstances were. It could even have been fixed, for all I know, but the habit of using <> has become engrained.
  • a_riot42a_riot42 Posts: 1,624
    I think finding that bug drove me temporarily insane and I simply dumped the entire memory of it from my brain.
    Paul
  • mpullinmpullin Posts: 949
    When I look at <>, it bothers me... I get a feeling that something is missing.
  • C.HouliarasC.Houliaras Posts: 53
    mpullin wrote: »
    When I look at , it bothers me... I get a feeling that something is missing.

    I like how >< looks...
Sign In or Register to comment.