peq settings
dew
Posts: 14
What is the Q setting on the PEQ, it's the bandwidth I'm assuming, but what is the range of frequencies for that specific number (on the Q setting)?
Dew
Dew
0
Comments
gadget
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-bandwidth.htm
Mark
This is an example using “whole note� examples in hz of octaves for the purpose of discussing PEQ Q factor to octave comparison…Note: There are 10 octaves, but only 8 in the “fundamental� frequencies.
25
50
100
200
400
800
1600
3200
6400 The end of the \"primary\"frequencies (C8 ) 4186.0096hz
12,800 Anything above about 8500 hz is not a fundamental frequency.
Below is the actual “musical note� equivalent of the above chart..
Octave starts with @ f in hz ends just before notes
0 CO 16.3516Hz C1 only organ-keyboard
1 C1 32.7032Hz C2
2 C2 65.4064Hz C3 C2 is low C
3 C3 130.8128Hz C4
4 C4 261.6256Hz C5 C4 is middle C
5 C5 523.2512Hz C6
6 C6 1,046.5024Hz C6 C6 is high C
7 C7 2,093.0048Hz C7
8 C8 4,186.0096Hz C8 C8 = last note on a
piano or a piccolo
9 C9 8,372.0192Hz C9 Anything higher than
C8 is NOT considered a fundamental frequency
10 C10 16,744.0384HZ
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-bandwidth.htm
figure into the equation....
E1= 4 string bass low \"E\" standard tuning = 41.20 hz, E2 then is the 6 string guitar being 1 octave higher and therefore 82.41 hz standard tuning low \"E\"
Gadget
When I open DR260 PEQ band 2 “Q� is set at 0.939.
If I move the “Q� to 4.31 then it is equivalent to a “fader� on my 1/3 octave graphic
What \"range of frequencies\" on that fader??? Depends on which fader you are using!
So the question was:-
Depends where the �Q� filter sits in relation to what \"Fo:\" (frequency) that is selected.
There is no direct comparison between \"the number of Frequencies\" and a \"Q\" filter in this type of filter
The lower in the frequency band the \"Q\" sits, the less number of frequencies that are being affected. (same as my 1/3 octave graphic)
If you use a narrow “Q� the number rises and the filter narrows.
If I go to “Q� of 14.5 that = 1/10 octave. Narrower filter. Less frequencies are affected, and again depends where the �Q� filter sits in relation to what \"Fo:\" (frequency) that is selected.
In the DRPA the feedback “Q� filters are below
The chart at http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-bandwidth.htm
Gives the comparison between Bandwidth per octave and “Q� filter.
Bandwith per octave 3/4 = 1.9 \"Q\" filter
Bandwith per octave 1/3 = 4.3 \"Q\" filter
Bandwith per octave 1/10 = 14.4 \"Q\" filter
Bandwith per octave 1/80 = 115.4 \"Q\" filter
Hope I have explained it right and it all this makes sense.
Mark
There is no direct comparison between \"the number of Frequencies\" and a \"Q\" filter with Driverack's \"Q\" filters
Another bit of info
If the keys on a piano were proportional in size to the \"Q\" then ....
If they were proportional to the frequency wave length in size then .....
If proportional to % of octive then ....
White keys only... there are 7 steps or intervals to the next octive (8 makes an octive). Each octive has this same required pattern.
% / octive - Each key is 12.5% of an octive and therefore each key is of equal size.
FWL(~) - Keys are larger on the low frequency end and decrease to very small on the higher end.
Q - A given \"Q\" will encompass a set number of keys. 1, 2, 6, whatever. So, if the \"Q\" locks on to 3 keys in an octive two below middle C, then that same \"Q\" will lock on to 3 keys an octive above middle C, or 4 above, or 20 above, or 7 below, etc, etc, etc.
Q = %/octive, therefore, any \"Q\" is nothing more than a fixed portion (%) of the entire sound spectrum?
Hi-Q (larger #) = lo %
Lo-Q (smaller #) = hi % (With a \"Q\" of 0 being unachievable.)
Does that make sense to anyone? Have I danced around the question and not even answered it?
DRA
What if you have fat fingers???
Can you only play the larger \"Q\" notes??