Bad nite
premier1
Posts: 119
Last nite was horrible ! I feel like I lost everything I learned,our singer was all over the place and she kept walking out in front of the speakers and it was a feedback nightmare from hell...The monitors were feeding back, if it could go wrong it did last night, overall the system just seemed so hot last nite, real tinny and my highs were not adjusted out of control, I even turned them all the way down on the vocal chanels , something was off anyway it just made for a bad nite, now it will drive me crazy to re do everything and find the place I went wrong, I could not eq the room with the amount of people eating dinner so I just turned off the GEQ to flat...Just Bad...Im an amature for sure and instead of being calm I panicked and started turning things off...so much for trying the subs out last nite
0
Comments
Did you use the AFS to get rid of the worst problems? What was your process?
DRA
DRA
The second operation would be for tuning your system to the venue. A lot of venues will not allow you to use pink noise because of customers. This operation is trickier than the outdoor operation and you can do more harm than good if you don't know what you are doing. Gadget will have more details to share on this second operation.
Just correctly completing the outdoor operation will give you a great starting point and even if you can't tune to the venue, I doubt you would have another "crash and burn" with your FOH...monitors are another topic.
Dennis
I had a long elaborate post all ready and the damn computer ate it :evil: I will attempt to re-compose.
As Dennis has so eloquently put it, the outdoor auto eq when flattening the system offers a number of benefits...especially for "inexpensive" speakers that have MANY compromises... (we'll get to those again in a moment) A stored flat preset will allow you to go into many rooms and have usable results without ANY changes... a flat response means that EQUAL energy is applied to all of the ISO center frequencies that the driverack uses (28 in all). This means that there are less "spurious" (overly accentuated) frequencies to excite the room.
You can EQ a speaker to a room, but you can NOT eq a room....only a bulldozer can do that
HOWEVER, Eq is a poor way to deal with indoor acoustics and should be looked at as a last resort for dealing with this issues...
Lets take a look at your speakers and see what we can determine:
1. HF pattern control: 90x50... means spraying high frequency sounds all over the hard surfaces( walls, ceiling and floors and any HVAC, hanging lighting, pipes, poles, Art... you get the idea right? Those frequencies bounce around and cause feedback and cancellations and all manner of sonic chaos. (40X60 would go a long ways toward offering better pattern control and less activation of active rooms)
2. With a 15" woofer and horn that crosses in well north or 2000hz, you have BEAMY midrange, meaning instead of even coverage, it acts more like the HF and beam reflected energy that once again causes all manner of sonic chaos. (but mostly feedback, and uneven coverage)
3. Uneven frequency response. It takes great drivers and un-compromised cabinet design to even come close to a speaker that has 20-20,000hz response and flat response. (NOT something you get in a speaker any where NEAR that of the Tapco line) NOT what you have in those speakers of yours...in fact, EV is so proud of those speakers they don't even provide a spec sheet much less a hyped frequency response chart, or an EASE chart or even a frequency based directivity chart...
Now, EVERY room has a point of no return, meaning that there is a point where one more dB added will cause the sound to break down completely (and every speaker system, the more you push it past the sound level that you tuned it at, WILL start to feed back...it is inevitable)
So, you made a big mistake going to unprocessed...... you don't know if it was the monitors that were causing the problem or the mains...
Lets take a look at the monitors and mic placement now.
There is a "best" monitor position for each mic pattern...here is some reading:
http://www.ratsound.com/2009_12_02_polars.htm
Note that the max rejection position for the mic is at the 180 degree position (or right opposite the mic stand and with the mic butt ... where the cord comes out... ) aimed AT the horn of the monitor.
Whereas, the super cardioid mic has maximum rejection at 125 degrees left or right of the center point of the mic...
So placement of the mic is critical for best gain before feedback. I suspect the monitors were VERY guilty in the feedback machine you created...
Note also that "IF" the mains were not tuned properly, AND they were positioned in such a way as to be "heard" by the mics... then feedback would be a definite problem... make sure the mics are well behind the mains...
I would rather see you use the auto eq from flat and then set up 3 PEQ's for the system...
1. Set @ 50hz with a Q of about 3.0 and you could add or subtract (but I suspect you will need to cut @ that frequency)
2. Set @ 350hz with a Q of about 1.0... again I suspect you will want to cut there to help with room modes
3. Set one @ 2k5 and again a Q of about 1.0 add gain for more clarity, and cut for squeals
4. there is an additional room mode that could develop around 120 to 160 hz that one would be addressable with a Q of about 1.5... and is almost always a cut as well...
As for the amount of these cuts, you will need to experiment... the PEQ's are NOT like GEQ bands and need to be listened for more carefully.
All for now...
GADGET
Gadget
By the way here are all the specs on the tapco 6915 if it helsp at all, whatever you can deciper from it and your thoughts on anything would be greatly apreciated, Thanks again
6915 Specifications
System
System Type: Two-way, full-range loudspeaker
Frequency Range (–10 dB): 47 Hz to 18 kHz
Sensitivity (1W @ 1m): 101.1 dB SPL
Nominal Impedance: 8 ohms
Power Handling: 300 watts continuous
600 watts program
Transducers
Low Frequency: 15 in/381 mm woofer, vented
High Frequency: 1 in/25 mm tweeter,
Physical
Input Connectors: One 1/4� TS jack,
one Speakon jack, paralleled
Enclosure: Wood with textured black PVC vinyl covering
Dimensions:
Height: 28.1 in/71.4 cm
Width: 17.8 in/45.1 cm
Depth: 15.6 in/39.6 cm
Weight: 51 lb/23 kg
Mounting: Pole-mountable
Right now my favorites are the D.A.S. Audio RF 12.64...
http://www.dasaudio.com/index.asp?pagin ... ia=158&d=0
they run just under $800 and are THE BOMB :shock: for the buck. Northern Sound and Lighting sells them, but they don't advertise them... you have to call and ask specifically for that model.
That speaker is better than the JBL SRX series @ double the cost...Maybe Dr. J will chime in.. he bought a pair solely on my say so.. and he's pretty blown away by them...and he had JBL to begin with...
It sounds like this guy really did have a BAD Nite. Geesh -- I remember those. I also remember trying to decide what would make the next biggest difference for my system & you and Dennis kept saying, "Gotta get new tops" & don't go with 15's get 12's. Well, that is what I ended up doing and Gadget is right about the best bang for the buck. The D.A.S. audio Rf series 12.64 has got to be the best bang for the buck. There is no way you can build a box with that kind craftmanship & components. They array nicely, have several rigging point options including rotatable horns. I don't think I will bother to buy another type of FOH box honestly. $782.10 per box plus whatever shipping was (don't remember).
Anyway Premier 1 -- hang in there and get to work on the outdoor tuning stuff. It is the only way to get your sound more even. New tops would help tremendously BUT learn everything you can on here and you will be fine.
Hey G -- Did you ever get a Smaart rig going?