Capabilities of Cafe Duet/Java Greater Than Netlinx?
dbfreq
Posts: 9
Hi,
I'm new to AMX programming. I've been to Programmer I, but, that's about it. So, I don't have a lot invested in Netlinx. I'm wondering whether it makes more sense to continue learning Netlinx, or, to learn Java straight-away. Is Java the future of AMX programming? One nice thing about Java is the ready availability of programming books and classes at local universities makes it easier to learn on my own than Netlinx would be. Also, I'd like to focus on including other content on AMX panels -- tie-ins to Outlook/ Exchange calendars, and task lists, bringing in Internet content, such as local events, movie times, etc. into our standard GUI and maybe even control over iTunes.
Given that, I guess I have two questions:
1. Would I be better off learning as little Netlinx as possible and moving to Java as quickly as possible?
2. Does Java allow programmers to do things they couldn't otherwise do in Netlinx, or, to do the same things more efficiently? Or, are they equivalent means to the same end?
Thanks.
I'm new to AMX programming. I've been to Programmer I, but, that's about it. So, I don't have a lot invested in Netlinx. I'm wondering whether it makes more sense to continue learning Netlinx, or, to learn Java straight-away. Is Java the future of AMX programming? One nice thing about Java is the ready availability of programming books and classes at local universities makes it easier to learn on my own than Netlinx would be. Also, I'd like to focus on including other content on AMX panels -- tie-ins to Outlook/ Exchange calendars, and task lists, bringing in Internet content, such as local events, movie times, etc. into our standard GUI and maybe even control over iTunes.
Given that, I guess I have two questions:
1. Would I be better off learning as little Netlinx as possible and moving to Java as quickly as possible?
2. Does Java allow programmers to do things they couldn't otherwise do in Netlinx, or, to do the same things more efficiently? Or, are they equivalent means to the same end?
Thanks.
0
Comments
It all depends on what you expect and want to accomplish. My first experience with writing Axcess code was in 1992. If Java was an option then, I would have taken the Java route.
You can do quite a bit more in Java than what can be done in Netlinx.
Webservices
Soap
SSL
Database
etc.
You can do this now if you have a good understanding of Java. It's just not documented nor promoted.
In spirit I agree. The reality is the universities and junior colleges are turning out C# and Java programmers. It's the way of the world.
There is quite a bit more rope provided when writing 100% in Java. Which presents another issue - support. Unless the market pushes for 100% Java, I don't think we will ever see AMX truly support it.
As an independent programmer I am forced to swim with the current. It's my reality.
I have worked with all generations of AMX hardware starting at SX. One York system.
Cheers